‘Behaviour and Morality have Remained Irreproachable, and his Commercial Reputation is Good’
Applying for Naturalisation in Late-Nineteenth-Century Antwerp and Rotterdam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51769/bmgn-lchr.6999Keywords:
port cities, naturalisation, nationality, citizenship, local belonging, migrationAbstract
In the late nineteenth century, with the expansion of their harbours and the growth of transatlantic mobility, the port cities of Antwerp and Rotterdam became home to economically important and large migrant communities. In a context marked by the often-claimed rise of the nation state, when national legislation concerning nationality and citizenship was shifting, local authorities and citizens played an important but still underestimated role when it came to enforcing the naturalisation of foreign nationals. Applications for naturalisation in both Antwerp and Rotterdam were firmly rooted in the local context, and economic performance was key to the police commissar’s support of an applicant’s case towards the national authorities. By comparatively analysing individual applications for naturalisation in Antwerp and Rotterdam, this paper argues that the close relationship between the nation-state and the mechanisms of legal inclusion and exclusion on which it rested, has to be relativised.
Aan het eind van de negentiende eeuw werden de steden Antwerpen en Rotterdam, dankzij de uitbreiding van hun havens en de groei van de trans-Atlantische mobiliteit, de thuisbasis van grote en economisch belangrijke migrantengemeenschappen. In een periode die in de historiografie vaak gekenmerkt wordt door de veronderstelde opkomst van de natiestaat en veranderende wetgeving omtrent nationaliteit en burgerschap, speelden lokale overheden en burgers een belangrijke, maar nog vaak onderschatte rol bij het bewerkstelligen van naturalisatie van mensen met een migratieachtergrond. Zowel in Antwerpen als in Rotterdam waren naturalisatieverzoeken duidelijk gesitueerd in de lokale context van de aanvrager. Zo was het economische succes van een aanvrager een doorslaggevende factor voor het verkrijgen van steun van de politiecommissaris. Deze steun vergrootte de kans van slagen van een naturalisatieaanvraag bij de nationale overheid. Aan de hand van een vergelijkend onderzoek naar individuele naturalisatieaanvragen in Antwerpen en Rotterdam, stelt dit artikel dat de hechte relatie tussen de natiestaat en de mechanismen van wettelijke in- en uitsluiting waarop die berust, moet worden gerelativeerd.
Current events paragraph
Nationality for sale?
Applications for naturalisation in late-nineteenth century Antwerp and Rotterdam
In October 2020, the Maltese legislator made it possible for non-EU citizens to purchase citizenship for 650.000 Euro. Malta is not the only EU member state having citizenship on sale: in 2013, Cyprus made its citizenship and thereby legal access to the Schengen-area available for 3 million Euro. Suspiciously observed by the European Commission, the citizenship commerce remains a controversial means to polish state budgets robbed by the 2008 financial crisis. Yet, financial and economic interests as driving forces behind the naturalisation of foreign nationals is not a recent phenomenon. It was present with similar appearance in late-nineteenth century Antwerp and Rotterdam, at a time when the nation state as an ideal, supposedly, was at its heyday. As the article by Christina Reimann in BMGN 136:3 demonstrates, local authorities had a say in the national naturalisation procedures. As local, often port-related interests – and not merely ideals of national belonging – were involved, conducting successful business in the port was a good reason to be optimistic about one’s application for naturalisation.
Downloads
![](https://bmgn-lchr.nl/public/journals/1/submission_6999_6999_coverImage_en_US.jpg)
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Christina Reimann
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
Authors are explicitly encouraged to deposit their published article in their institutional repository.