De Slavernij is onze geschiedenis (niet). Over de discursieve strijd om de betekenis van de ntr- televisieserie De Slavernij

Author(s)

  • Guno Jones Royal Netherlands Historical Society (reviews)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18352/bmgn-lchr.8227

Keywords:

Slavery, Media, Historiography, Public Debate, Emancipation

Abstract

Slavery is (Not) Our History: On the Public Debate and Divergent Meanings of the NTR Television Series Slavery

This article discusses the debates that followed the broadcasting of Dutch NTR-television series Slavery (De Slavernij) in 2011. While the series was aimed at informing the general public about this silenced part of Dutch history, the subsequent debates on the series revealed fault lines in Dutch society with regard to ideas on how to know and represent slavery adequately. Although most participants, in line of a positivist epistemology, made appeals to historical facts, these debates clearly demonstrated how knowledge and representations of slavery are positioned in a social and academic field that is always characterised by power relations.

 

Postcolonial critics, whose voices are underrepresented in Dutch academia and media, held very different perspectives on the nature of ‘valid’ paradigms, ‘true’ facts, ‘proper’ interpretations, ‘appropriate’ historical referents and representations concerning slavery to people who praised the series. These polarised debates pose the question of how to engage with the history of slavery without resorting to (biological) essentialism that is precisely one of its potent legacies ‘we’ want to overcome.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2012-12-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

De Slavernij is onze geschiedenis (niet). Over de discursieve strijd om de betekenis van de ntr- televisieserie De Slavernij. (2012). BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review, 127(4), 56-82. https://doi.org/10.18352/bmgn-lchr.8227